🧮 ML Research Engineering · Evaluation Integrity
Choose benchmarks that mean something
Benchmark suites matched to target capabilities with contamination checks and honest scopes.
intermediate~30 minResearch EngineersML ScientistsPhD Researchers
Steps
- 1Define capability claims first; benchmarks follow claims, not reverse
- 2Check train/test contamination against your corpora before trusting numbers
- 3Prefer held-out private sets for anything heading to publication
- 4Report full suite including unfavorable tasks, not highlights
- 5State statistical significance; differences inside noise bands are ties
- 6Archive exact eval configs alongside results permanently
Common Pitfalls
- ▲SOTA claimed on benchmarks the model effectively memorized
- ▲Task suites drifting between model generations
Commands
Install with skills CLI
$ npx skills add aniruddhaadak80/skills --skill evaluation-integrity-benchmark-selection-honestyInstall globally
$ npx skills add aniruddhaadak80/skills --skill evaluation-integrity-benchmark-selection-honesty -gTags
#benchmarks#evaluation#integrity#ml-research#evaluation-integrity